These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A prospective study of binocular visual function before and after successful surgery to remove a unilateral epiretinal membrane.
    Author: Asaria R, Garnham L, Gregor ZJ, Sloper JJ.
    Journal: Ophthalmology; 2008 Nov; 115(11):1930-7. PubMed ID: 18722667.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a unilateral epiretinal membrane (uERM) on visual acuity, stereopsis, and motor fusion in patients before and after successful surgery to remove the membrane. DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients undergoing surgery to remove an idiopathic uERM and 30 normal control subjects. METHODS: Patients underwent full orthoptic examination before and between 3 and 6 months after surgery to remove a uERM. Stereoacuities were analyzed statistically using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman correlation. Motor fusion ranges and visual acuities were compared using paired and unpaired t tests, with correlations examined by linear regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Snellen visual acuity, TNO (stereoscopic acuity test of the Netherlands; Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research; Laméris Ootech BV, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands) and Titmus stereoacuity, motor fusion range. RESULTS: Postoperative acuity and improvement in visual acuity after removal of a uERM were better in patients with a shorter duration of symptoms. Stereoacuity was substantially reduced in the presence of a uERM (TNO, P<0.001; Titmus, P<0.001; Mann-Whitney U test), as were total motor fusion ranges at near and distance (near P = 0.002; distance P = 0.015; t test). Stereoacuity was worse in patients with symptoms of longer duration (TNO, P = 0.21; Titmus, P = 0.045; Spearman rank correlation). After successful surgery, stereoscopic function improved. This improvement occurred mainly in those patients with better preoperative stereoacuity and a shorter duration of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in visual acuity after surgery was greater in patients with visual symptoms of shorter duration. A uERM adversely affected stereoscopic function, an effect that increased with time. The best monocular and binocular visual outcomes occurred in those patients who had earlier surgery.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]