These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Septic shock in the Intensive Care Unit, Hillbrow Hospital, Johannesburg.
    Author: Smith C, Arregui LM, Promnitz DA, Feldman C.
    Journal: S Afr Med J; 1991 Aug 17; 80(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 1876952.
    Abstract:
    The records of all patients with septic shock admitted to an intensive care unit during a 15-month period were analysed retrospectively. The main purpose of the study was to describe the aetiology and clinical features of illness, and to determine the outcome of the patients, including those factors influencing prognosis. Thirty-five patients (46% medical, 54% surgical) fulfilling the criteria for the diagnosis of septic shock were admitted to the study. There were 21 male and 14 female patients. Most infections were community-acquired (69%). The two most common sources of infection were the respiratory tract and abdomen. All patients required inotropic blood pressure support. Most patients (94%) were mechanically ventilated and 7 required dialysis. Organisms, sometimes multiple, were isolated in 18 patients. Fifty percent of the isolates (12 of 24) were Gram-negative, 10 were Gram-positive and there were 2 associated Candida albicans bacteraemias. The overall mortality rate was 40%. There was no difference in outcome between community or hospital-acquired infections, infections with Gram-positive or Gram-negative organisms, or in patients with differing sources of sepsis. Features associated with a poorer prognosis were older age and higher bilirubin value.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]