These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Intra-individual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the supraaortic vessels at 3 Tesla.
    Author: Bueltmann E, Erb G, Kirchin MA, Klose U, Naegele T.
    Journal: Invest Radiol; 2008 Oct; 43(10):695-702. PubMed ID: 18791411.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To compare gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) and gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the supraaortic vessels at 3 Tesla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers each underwent two contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography examinations, one with Gd-BOPTA and one with Gd-DTPA each at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg bodyweight. The 2 examinations were performed in randomized order and were separated by at least 72 hours. Imaging was performed in the coronal plane at 3T (Magnetom TIM Trio Siemens) using a 12-channel neurovascular array coil. The MR sequence parameters were identical for all examinations. Maximum intensity projection reconstructions were evaluated separately and in matched-pairs by a single independent blinded reviewer in terms of qualitative (5-point scales for technical quality and vessel delineation) and quantitative (relative contrast-to-noise ratio) contrast enhancement across 19 arteries/arterial segments comprising the internal carotid arteries; anterior, middle, and posterior cerebral arteries; vertebral arteries; and basilar artery. Findings were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: The mean technical quality across all examinations was significantly (P = 0.031) greater after Gd-BOPTA. The overall median score for vessel delineation was also significantly higher for Gd-BOPTA than for Gd-DTPA (4.3 vs. 3.7; P = 0.005). Matched-pairs assessment revealed significant (P <or= 0.026) preference for Gd-BOPTA both globally and for assessments of the extracranial arteries, Circle of Willis and vessels distal to the Circle of Willis. The relative contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly (P <or= 0.021) greater after Gd-BOPTA, with overall increases of 23.3%, 26.7%, and 28.5% noted for the internal carotid, middle cerebral, and basilar arteries, respectively. CONCLUSION: Significantly improved image quality and contrast enhancement is achieved at 3T with 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-BOPTA compared with 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]