These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: The corrective effects of warning on false memories in the DRM paradigm are limited to full attention conditions.
    Author: Peters MJ, Jelicic M, Gorski B, Sijstermans K, Giesbrecht T, Merckelbach H.
    Journal: Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Oct; 129(2):308-14. PubMed ID: 18804192.
    Abstract:
    Effects of attention control and forewarning on the activation and monitoring of experimentally induced false memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm were investigated in a young adult sample (N=77). We found that reducing the degree of attention during encoding led to a decrease in veridical recall and an increase in non-presented critical lure intrusions. This effect could not be counteracted by a forewarning instruction. However, these findings did not emerge in a (retrieval supportive) recognition task. It seems that divided attention increases false recall when attention control and forewarning have to compete for limited cognitive resources in a generative free recall as opposed to a retrieval supportive recognition task. Forewarning instructions do not always protect young adults against experimentally induced false memories.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]