These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Our experience with 151 cases of abdominal extraperitoneal section in the Obstetrics-Gynecology Department of the Municipal Main Hospital in Ruse].
    Author: Dŭrveniashki Kh, Dŭrveniashka I.
    Journal: Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1991; 30(2):10-4. PubMed ID: 1883040.
    Abstract:
    The authors describe their experience in abdominal extraperitoneal section of 151 women. 37,986 deliveries occurred at the OG complex in the town of Ruse for the period of 1975-1985. 1,853 women (4.87%) delivered by cesarean section. 151 out of 1853 women delivered by cesarean section, using the method of Morozov. Indications on the side of the mother were found in 98 women (64.90%): protracted labour, weak and nonproductive labour activity with outpoured amniotic fluid accompanied by febrile states and signs for starting or present intrapartum infection, proven by laboratory parameters. Indications on the side of the mother and fetus were found in 53 women (35.09%) without signs of intrapartum infections. The results are very good. The operated women recover more quickly during the postoperative period. No venous administrations are needed, since women take orally fluids and food without limitations. The authors conclude that the abdominal extraperitoneal section presents greater advantages for the patient during the postoperative period. They do not think that it should be used as a routine method. It is more complex and has more requirements than the classical cesarean section. The abdominal extraperitoneal section has its place in the obstetric practice in women with intrapartum infection.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]