These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Agreement between multidetector-row CT angiography and ultrasound echo-color Doppler in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
    Author: Saba L, Sanfilippo R, Montisci R, Mallarini G.
    Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis; 2008; 26(5):525-32. PubMed ID: 18836263.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Stroke is a leading cause of severe disability in the western world. A correct diagnostic procedure to stratify risk is necessary in order to rapidly plan the most efficient therapy. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the agreement between ultrasound echo-color Doppler (US-ECD) and multidetector-row CT angiography (MDCTA) in determining the degree of carotid stenosis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From January 2004 to February 2007, 187 patients who had previously undergone both US-ECD and MDCTA were studied retrospectively. For each patient, stenosis degree was measured by applying the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria. Data derived from MDCTA and US-ECD were then compared to calculate the inter-technique variability by using Cohen kappa statistics. For all plaque types (fatty, mixed and calcified), inter-technique variability was assessed. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to highlight differences between the procedures, and scatterplots were also calculated. As a gold standard, reference surgical comparisons were performed in 50 patients. RESULTS: The percentage of observed agreements in the evaluation of stenosis degree was 72.19% with a kappa value of 0.659 (95% confidence interval: 0.604-0.715) and a weighted kappa of 0.789. After the evaluating stenosis degree in fatty, mixed and calcified plaques, the percentages of observed agreements were 79.31, 74.58 and 64.29%, respectively, with kappa values of 0.738, 0.691 and 0.565. CONCLUSION: A good agreement between US-ECD and MDCTA in the evaluation of stenosis degree was observed, together with a remarkable difference between the 2 techniques in the assessment both of calcified plaques and of plaques showing a predominant calcific component.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]