These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Management of penile fractures.
    Author: Ghilan AM, Al-Asbahi WA, Ghafour MA, Alwan MA, Al-Khanbashi OM.
    Journal: Saudi Med J; 2008 Oct; 29(10):1443-7. PubMed ID: 18946570.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To present our experience with surgical and conservative management of penile fracture. METHODS: This prospective study was carried out in the Urology and Nephrology Center, at Al-Thawra Modern General and Teaching Hospital, Sana'a, Yemen from June 2003 to September 2007, and included 30 patients presenting with penile fracture. Diagnosis was made clinically in all our patients. Six patients with simple fracture were treated conservatively while 24 patients with more severe injuries were operated upon. RESULTS: Patients' ages ranged from 24-52 years (mean 31.3 years), 46.7% of patients were under the age of 30 years and 56.7% were unmarried. Hard manipulation of the erect penis for example during masturbation was the most frequent mechanism of fracture in 53.3% of patients. Solitary tear was found in 22 patients and bilateral corporal tears associated with urethral injury were found in 2 patients. Corporal tears were sutured with synthetic absorbable sutures and urethral injury was repaired primarily. All operated patients described full erection with straight penis except 3 of the 8 patients who were managed by direct longitudinal incision, in whom mild curvature during erection was observed. The conservatively treated patients described satisfactory penile straightness and erection. CONCLUSION: The optimal functional and cosmetic results are achieved following immediate surgical repair of penis fracture. Good results can also be obtained in some selected patients with conservative management.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]