These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Laryngeal transplantation in the setting of cancer: a rat model. Author: Shipchandler TZ, Lorenz RR, Lee WT, Teker AM, Dan O, Strome M. Journal: Laryngoscope; 2008 Dec; 118(12):2166-71. PubMed ID: 18948827. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Traditional immunosuppressive regimens make laryngeal transplantation in cancer patients prohibitive because of the increased risk of recurrence. Everolimus, a recently developed immunosuppressant, has demonstrated significant antitumor properties. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of everolimus alone and in combination with other immunosuppressants on tumor growth in a combined laryngeal transplantation and tumor model. STUDY DESIGN: Animal, prospective, randomized, controlled, and blinded. METHODS: One million squamous cell carcinoma cells (SCC-158) were injected intravenously into a total of 40 rats 1 day before laryngeal transplantation. Rats were divided into four groups differing by immunosuppressive regimens. Lung surface metastases were counted 21 days after inoculation, and numerical transplantation rejection scores were recorded. A separate experiment for comparison was performed with no transplant on 24 rats, but with the same immunosuppressive treatment groups. RESULTS: The median number of lung surface metastases were: a) control (i.e., no immunosuppression): 85; b) everolimus 1.0 mg/kg: 25; c) tacrolimus 1.2 mg/kg: 1650; d) everolimus 1.0 mg/kg + tacrolimus 0.05 mg/kg: 1300. Rats receiving everolimus alone showed a statistically significant decrease in pulmonary surface metastases compared with the other groups. Transplanted rats had no difference in their outcomes when compared with non-transplanted rats. CONCLUSION: Everolimus significantly decreases SCC-158 growth in our combined transplantation and tumor model compared with controls and other immunosuppressants.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]