These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Clarifying the diagnosis of clinically suspected recurrence of cervical cancer: impact of 18F-FDG PET.
    Author: van der Veldt AA, Buist MR, van Baal MW, Comans EF, Hoekstra OS, Molthoff CF.
    Journal: J Nucl Med; 2008 Dec; 49(12):1936-43. PubMed ID: 18997039.
    Abstract:
    UNLABELLED: Clarifying the diagnosis of clinically suspected recurrence of cervical cancer can be challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical value of (18)F-FDG PET in this context. METHODS: The medical records of a cohort of 40 (18)F-FDG PET referrals in whom recurrence of cervical cancer was clinically suspected were reviewed. Two expert gynecologic oncologists assessed the level of pre-PET clinical doubt, quality of pre-PET work-up, and impact of (18)F-FDG PET on diagnostic understanding and management using questionnaires. RESULTS: In patients with clinically equivocal recurrence, (18)F-FDG PET had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 93% (prevalence, 65%). Before (18)F-FDG PET, there was high disagreement about the adequacy of the conventional work-up (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.25) and the presence of recurrence (ICC, 0.24). (18)F-FDG PET increased experts' confidence (median increase, 14% and 25%; P < 0.0001) and diagnostic agreement (from 68% to 98%; ICC, from 0.24 to 0.95). When (18)F-FDG PET was positive for recurrence, the median overall survival was 13 mo. For patients with negative (18)F-FDG PET findings, the median survival was not reached (log rank, 15.50, P = 0.0001). When the treatment plan was categorized as local therapy, systemic therapy, and expectative management, (18)F-FDG PET changed the treatment plan in half of all cases. The 2 experts reported that (18)F-FDG PET led to a better diagnosis and a beneficial change in management in, respectively, 60% and 65% of cases. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET can help to clarify the diagnosis of clinically suspected recurrence of cervical cancer. In this patient population, (18)F-FDG PET had significant value in diagnostic understanding and management of recurrent cervical cancer, facilitating decision making and treatment planning. Therefore, (18)F-FDG PET should be part of the diagnostic work-up in detection of recurrent cervical cancer. The high positive predictive value of (18)F-FDG PET in these patients suggests that inclusion in intervention trials might be based on a positive (18)F-FDG PET scan.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]