These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The real role of forearm mixed nerve conduction velocity in the assessment of proximal forearm conduction slowing in carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Author: Chang MH, Lee YC, Hsieh PF.
    Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 25(6):373-7. PubMed ID: 18997631.
    Abstract:
    The decrease of forearm median motor conduction velocity (CV) in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common electrodiagnostic finding in clinical practice and is possibly secondary to either conduction block at wrist or retrograde conduction slowing (RCS). This study is attempted to confirm the existence of RCS and to explore why this controversy occurs for a long time. Eighty CTS patients and controls were recruited. In addition to conventional electrodiagnosis, subjects received further electrodiagnostic protocol. First, a recording electrode was placed over the wrist and then at elbow with palm stimulation to calculate indirect forearm mixed nerve CV (forearm-mix CV) that represented real measurement of nerve fibers through the carpal tunnel. Then, direct measurement of forearm-mix CV was performed with recording at the elbow and stimulation at the wrist. CTS patients had markedly prolonged distal motor and sensory latencies and significantly prolonged wrist-palm sensory and motor conduction. There was a significant decrease in forearm median motor CV; however, there was no difference in ulnar distal motor latency and forearm motor CV. The mild decrease of forearm median motor CV was not proportional to the marked reduction of W-P MCV and there was no demonstrated conduction block at wrist, implying the reduction of forearm median motor CV is unlikely due to conduction blockage or slowing of the large myelinating fibers at the wrist and RCS really occurs over the forearm median nerve. In addition, the direct Forearm-mix CV was similar in CTS and controls; however, there was a significant decrease in indirect forearm-mix CV only in the CTS. Moreover, the difference between direct and indirect forearm-mix CV was significantly greater and poor consistency of direct and indirect forearm-mix CV in CTS, suggesting that direct and indirect forearm-mix CV represent CV from quite different nerve fibers. Therefore, we conclude that RCS really does occur in CTS and the direct forearm-mix CV reflects the CV of nerve fibers without damage in CTS. The misinterpretation and measurement of different components of forearm-mix CV results in the existence of this controversy till now.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]