These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Establishment of dose-response relationships in BALB/c mice, using Brucella cell surface protein and lipopolysaccharide.
    Author: Pugh GW, Tabatabai LB, Phillips M, McDonald TJ.
    Journal: Am J Vet Res; 1991 Feb; 52(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 1901465.
    Abstract:
    A study was conducted to determine the immune (increased antibody) and protective (reduced colony-forming units) responses induced in mice by a: (i) single vaccinal inoculation, using various concentrations of Brucella cell surface protein (BCSP) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS); (ii) primary inoculation, using various concentrations of BCSP, followed by a secondary inoculation, using a standard concentration of BCSP; and (iii) primary inoculation, using 1 concentration of BCSP or LPS, followed by a secondary inoculation, using various concentrations of BCSP or LPS. Four weeks after the primary inoculation, mice were challenge exposed with approximately 1 x 10(4) colony-forming units of Brucella abortus strain 2308 and all mice were euthanatized at 6 weeks. Reduced splenic weights and reduced colony-forming units in the spleens of vaccinated mice, compared with nonvaccinated mice, were the criteria of protection. Increase in serum IgM and IgG was defined as immunity. Both BCSP and LPS induced protective and immune responses that were proportional to the dose given up to an optimal limit. However, concentrations higher than optimal decreased the protective and immune responses. This was true for mice given either 1 or 2 vaccinal inoculations. Enhanced secondary protective responses were seen only when suboptimal doses were used in the primary inoculation. Excessive or optimal doses in the secondary inoculations prevented or obscured the protectiveness and immunity by primary inoculations. The protective effects appeared to be additive when suboptimal doses were used in the primary and secondary inoculations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]