These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Persistent venous valves correlate with increased shunt and multiple preceding cryptogenic embolic events in patients with patent foramen ovale: an intracardiac echocardiographic study.
    Author: Rigatelli G, Dell'avvocata F, Braggion G, Giordan M, Chinaglia M, Cardaioli P.
    Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Dec 01; 72(7):973-6. PubMed ID: 19021284.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that prominent Eustachian valve (EV) and Chiari's network (CN) predispose to paradoxical embolism but their presence in patients with presumed paradoxical stroke is not always easily detectable by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). We sought to prospectively assess the frequency of EV/CN as assessed by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in patients submitted to patent foramen ovale (PFO) transcatheter closure in order to investigate their role in determining shunt severity and risk of multiple paradoxical embolisms. METHODS: Over a 36-month period, we prospectively enrolled 98 consecutive patients (mean age 37 +/- 12.5 years, 68 females) with previous stroke referred to our center for PFO catheter-based closure. All patients underwent transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TC-D), TEE and ICE-guided transcatheter closure. RESULTS: After ICE study and measurements, a prominent EV or CN were diagnosed on ICE in 72 patients (73.4%), whereas in 45 (45.9%, P < 0.01) on TEE. Patients with EV/CN had more frequently a curtain pattern on TC-D, a larger right-to-left shunt, and recurrent cerebral paradoxical embolisms before closure. EV/CN and medium-large shunt on TEE were the strongest predictors of recurrent paradoxical embolisms. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that EV and CN have a deep impact on the pathophysiology of paradoxical embolism: EV and CN should be considered as adjunctive risk factors for paradoxical embolism in the decision-making process involving PFO patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]