These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Hemodynamic evaluation and midterm outcome of aortic valve replacement with size 19 Perimount prosthetic valve.
    Author: Narayan P, Reeves BC, Rizvi SI, Shokrollahi K, Ismail H, Angelini GD, Nightingale A, Caputo M.
    Journal: Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Dec; 86(6):1799-803. PubMed ID: 19021980.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: We sought to investigate the effect of patient prosthesis mismatch on hemodynamic profile using dobutamine stress echocardiography, and to evaluate midterm survival of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with 19-mm Perimount (Baxter Healthcare, Santa Ana, California) aortic prosthetic valves. METHODS: Between December 1, 1999, and August 17, 2005, 147 patients (mean age, 76.8 +/- 5.51 years) had aortic valves replaced with 19-mm Perimount prostheses. Dobutamine stress echocardiography was performed in a subgroup of 24 patients (mean age, 76.6 +/- 5.60 years). Univariable predictors of peak transprosthetic gradient (PTG) under maximum stress, adjusted for resting PTG, were investigated by regression. Survival in the whole cohort was described, and univariable predictors of survival were investigated by Cox regression. RESULTS: In the stress echocardiography subgroup, cardiac output (p < 0.0001), PTG (p < 0.0001), and effective orifice area index increased significantly (p = 0.002) under stress. Peak transprosthetic gradient under stress was strongly associated with PTG at rest (p < 0.0001). After controlling for PTG at rest, no other variables were associated with PTG under stress. In the whole cohort, mean duration of follow-up was 2.21 years; 23 patients died. Neither body surface area nor effective orifice area index was significantly associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: The 19-mm Perimount aortic prosthesis has acceptable hemodynamic performance. Transvalvular gradients were within a clinically acceptable range, both at rest and under stress. These findings suggest that patient-prosthesis mismatch is unlikely to cause a clinically important problem when the prosthesis is used, which is consistent with survival experience in the whole cohort.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]