These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Analysis of recurrence pattern and prognosis of patients with cervical carcinoma and pelvic lymph node metastasis]. Author: Xiong Y, Liang LZ, Zheng M, Wang LH, Deng PF, Liu JH. Journal: Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 43(6):425-8. PubMed ID: 19035136. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pattern of disease relapse and prognostic risk factor of patients with cervical carcinoma and pelvic lymph node metastasis. METHODS: A total of 124 cases of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Ib1-IIa cervical carcinoma with pelvic node metastasis who were treated at the Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen University during January 1994 to December 2001 were selected for this study. Prognosis and recurrence were retrospectively analyzed using the clinico-pathological data RESULTS: The overall 5 year survival and 5 year disease-free survival were 63.3% and 61.4%, respectively. Overall recurrence rate was 39.5% (49/124), among which intra-pelvic relapse (61.0%, 25/41) was significantly more common than extra-pelvic relapse (31.7%,13/41; P=0.008). Multivariate analysis identified involvement of common iliac node as an independent prognostic factor (P=0.035). According to this factor, node-positive patients could be divided into low risk group (without common iliac node involvement, 104 cases) and high risk group (with common iliac node involvement, 20 cases). The 5 year disease-free survival were 69.4% and 24.5% respectively, with a significant difference (P=0.003). Intra-pelvic relapse was observed in 22.1% (23/104) of low risk and 25.0% (5/20) of high risk group respectively, with no significant difference (P>0.05). However extra-pelvic relapse was seen in 7.7% (8/104) of low risk and 40.0% (8/20) of high risk group, with a significant difference (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Common iliac node involvement is a significant factor influencing the prognosis of patients with cervical carcinoma and pelvic lymph node metastasis. Patients with positive common iliac nodes have significantly decreased 5 year disease-free survival and higher extra-pelvic disease recurrence rates compared with those whose common iliac nodes are negative. These findings provide important data for design of individualized treatment mode.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]