These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Temporary caval filter allowing diagnosis and fibrinolytic therapy in patients suspect of massive pulmonary embolism]. Author: Théry C, Asseman P, Becquart J, Bauchart JJ, Jabinet JL, Marache P. Journal: Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1991 Apr; 84(4):525-30. PubMed ID: 1905915. Abstract: The authors propose a therapeutic strategy enabling diagnosis, treatment and prevention in the same clinical procedure based on a series of 8 patients presenting with signs of massive pulmonary embolism (acute cardiorespiratory distress, shock, loss of consciousness, and/or cardiac arrest). A removable vena cava filter is rapidly introduced percutaneously via a brachial, femoral or jugular vein, and opened in the inferior vena cava. Using the same catheter and without a second venous puncture, pulmonary angiography and cavography are performed by digitised angiography using a small quantity of contrast medium (40 ml, 12 ml/sec). The diagnosis of massive pulmonary embolism (index of pulmonary obstruction 70 to 90%) was confirmed in 6 out of the 8 cases. In 2 patients, the contrast medium passed from the right atrium into the left atrium and one of the patients developed hemiplegia. Thrombolytic drugs (rt-PA followed by Streptokinase) were injected via the same filter catheter. The dosage of rt-PA was 20 to 50 mg as a bolus followed by 50 mg in 2 hours. Streptokinase was then infused at a dose of 100,000 U/hour for an average of 36 hours (24-48 hours), followed by intravenous heparin and oral vitamin K antagonists. Two patients required blood transfusion for haemorrhage during the relay with heparin. The temporary caval filter was removed in all cases but 3 patients required a definitive filter because of the persistence of life-threatening venous thrombosis. Seven of the 8 patients survived their pulmonary embolism. This approach is rapid, saves time, and spares the patients from more invasive procedures.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]