These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Selective removal of molybdenum traces from growth media of N2-fixing bacteria. Author: Schneider K, Müller A, Johannes KU, Diemann E, Kottmann J. Journal: Anal Biochem; 1991 Mar 02; 193(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 1908197. Abstract: A new method for the selective removal of traces of molybdenum from growth media of N2-fixing bacteria (Rhodobacter capsulatus and Klebsiella pneumoniae) was developed. This method is based on the filtration of nutrient solutions through a layer of activated carbon (pulverized charcoal). The adsorption of Mo (molybdate) to activated carbon was optimal if a charcoal suspension (50 g/liter) was degassed by boiling before use and if the pH of the solutions, which had to be purified, was adjusted to values between 1.5 and 4. In this pH region no or only negligible amounts of other metal ions were adsorbed. The activated carbon method was compared with other Mo-eliminating procedures, including 8-hydroxyquinoline/dichloromethane extraction, Chelex 100 chromatography, and treatment with Mo-starved Azotobacter vinelandii cells. The activated carbon filtration appeared to be the most effective, specific, and rapid method. Whereas the untreated Rhodobacter growth medium was contaminated with 1.2 ppb Mo, as analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), the activated carbon-treated medium was below the ICP-MS detection limit (less than 0.05 ppb). A similarly effective removal of Mo impurities was obtained by the Azotobacter treatment. Even at low optical densities (2-5 at 436 nm) Mo traces were removed very rapidly within 10-15 min. However, because the Mo uptake/Mo adsorption capacity of A. vinelandii depended on freshly cultivated cells and on the growth phase at which the cells were harvested, this microbiological method was generally more time-consuming and less reproducible than the activated carbon method.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]