These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Simulation of cupulolithiasis and canalolithiasis by an animal model.
    Author: Valli P, Botta L, Zucca G, Valli S, Buizza A.
    Journal: J Vestib Res; 2008; 18(2-3):89-96. PubMed ID: 19126979.
    Abstract:
    The physical mechanisms responsible for cupulolithiasis and canalolithiasis have been investigated by two groups of experiments in isolated posterior semicircular canal (SCC) of frog (Rana esculenta L.). First, clouds of 10-30 isolated otoconia were let to fall (snowfall of otoconia) either through the ampulla onto the cupula, or inside the long arm of the canal, opposite to the cupula. Second, microspheres ranging 30 to 350 microm in diameter were gently moved to and fro inside the long arm of the canal by a micromanipulator. The effects were evaluated by recording the firing rate (Nfr) of the ampullary nerve. Snowfall of otoconia produced detectable changes of Nfr only when otoconia got in contact with the cupula, but not when falling through the endolymph. Movement of the microspheres in the canal long arm induced Nfr changes only if the microsphere diameter exceeded about 50 microm. Although the exact microsphere size needed for receptor stimulation may depend on the experimental conditions, these results strongly suggest that debris moving inside a SCC (canalolithiasis) can produce transcupular pressures able to stimulate ampullar receptors only if they have suitable size, whereas isolated otoconia cannot, except when lying on the cupula (cupulolithiasis).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]