These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques.
    Author: Bresnahan L, Ogden AT, Natarajan RN, Fessler RG.
    Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan 01; 34(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 19127157.
    Abstract:
    STUDY DESIGN: A validated finite element model of the intact lumbar spine (L1-S1) was modified to study the biomechanical changes as a result of surgical alteration for treatment of stenosis at L3-L4 and L4-L5 using 2 established techniques and 1 new minimally invasive technique. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of graded posterior element removal associated with new surgical techniques on postoperative segmental motion and loading in the annulus. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several studies have shown that laminectomy increases and produces segmental instability unless fusion is performed. However, no data exist comparing the biomechanical impact of completely preserving the contralateral anatomy and what effect this has compared to traditional approaches. METHODS: The effect of graded removal of posterior elements because of iatrogenic change associated with the 3 approaches was investigated using an 800 N compressive preload using the follower load technique and application of 8 Nm flexion, 6 Nm extension, 4 Nm torsion, and 6 Nm lateral bending moments. RESULTS: This study shows that removal of posterior elements for treatment of stenosis at L3-L4 and L4-L5 results in increased flexion-extension and axial rotation at the surgical site. This study also shows that the segmental motion following a traditional laminectomy is greater than the minimally invasive approach in flexion, extension, left and right axial rotation. Moderate preservation of the posterior elements which occurs in the intralaminar approach generates greater segmental motion that the minimally invasive approach in extension, left and right axial rotation. CONCLUSION: Minimization of bone and ligament removal associated with minimally invasive procedures results in greater preservation of the normal motion of the lumbar spine after surgery. This study suggests that preservation of the posterior spinal elements associated with minimally invasive surgery could minimize the risk of developing de novo postoperative changes in spinal alignment and/or acceleration of facet and disc degeneration.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]