These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Comparison of detectability of small-bowel lesions between capsule endoscopy and double-balloon endoscopy for patients with suspected small-bowel disease. Author: Fukumoto A, Tanaka S, Shishido T, Takemura Y, Oka S, Chayama K. Journal: Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Apr; 69(4):857-65. PubMed ID: 19136103. Abstract: BACKGROUND: There are many reports of the usefulness of capsule endoscopy (CE) or double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) for the detection of small-bowel disease. However, there are few reports that compared CE and DBE. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether CE or DBE better detects small-bowel lesions in patients with suspected small-bowel disease. DESIGN: A prospective single-center study. SETTING: Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rates of CE and DBE detection of small-bowel lesions. PATIENTS: Seventy-six consecutive patients (47 men, 29 women; mean age 56.0 years) who underwent both CE and DBE. METHODS: CE was performed before DBE. DBEs were performed within 1 week, by both retrograde and antegrade approaches so that the entire small bowel could be examined, if possible. RESULTS: Small-bowel lesions were detected by CE in 42 patients (55.3%) and by DBE in 46 patients (60.5%). The difference was not significant (P = .45). Total enteroscopy was achieved by both examinations in 35 patients, and small-bowel lesions were detected by both examinations in 21 of the 35 patients (60.0%). Agreement between results of the 2 examinations was good (kappa = 0.76). LIMITATION: The main indication for examinations was not the same. CONCLUSIONS: CE and DBE are nearly equal in their ability to detect small-bowel lesions if the entire small bowel is examined.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]