These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Regulation of cellular trans-activating activities in two different promonocytic leukemia cell lines.
    Author: Chang KS, Liu WT, Josephs SF.
    Journal: Cancer Lett; 1991 Oct; 60(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 1913629.
    Abstract:
    Trans-activating activities of certain cellular promoter/enhancer genes may reflect the underlying mechanism for cellular differentiation. We have used two promonocytic leukemia cell lines, U937 and HL-CZ, which differ in their differentiation antigen expression. While both cell lines express CD15 antigen, only the former expresses both CD4 and CD10 antigens. These phenotypes suggest that these two cell lines appear to be arrested at different stages of differentiation. Some regions of the long terminal repeat (LTR) of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) contain nucleotide sequences which bind cellular trans-activating factors such as NF-kappa B and Sp1. These sequences are also present in cellular regulatory gene sequences. The cell lines have been transfected by electroporation with a nested series of deletion mutants containing different lengths of the promoter/enhancer region for HIV-LTR. The promoter/enhancer region has been linked to a 'reporter' chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) gene. We have found that promoter/enhancer trans-activation is markedly enhanced by treating transfected cells with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA), while similar treatment with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) slightly enhanced activation. U937 cells always showed much greater transactivating activities than did HL-CZ cells. Deletion of a negative regulatory element (NRE) from the LTR resulted in an enhanced transactivation, while deletions affecting NF-kappa B and/or Sp1 binding sites markedly reduced transactivation. Deletion of both NRE and NRF, a second negative regulatory factor binding site, from the LTR restored the transactivation. However, in the presence of TPA, deletion of NRE sequence without concomitant deletion of the downstream NRF binding sequence was sufficient for recovering transactivation. Since these two cell lines have shown subtle differences in these responses, it may be speculated that monocytes at different stages of differentiation may respond in different ways, qualitatively and/or quantitatively, to signal transduction factors involved in the transactivation of cellular genes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]