These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [The influence of immobilized laminin on karyotypic variability in two karyotypic different variants of the Indian muntjac skin fibroblast cell line].
    Author: Polianskaia GG, Goriachaia TS, Pinaev GP.
    Journal: Tsitologiia; 2008; 50(11):988-98. PubMed ID: 19140346.
    Abstract:
    The numerical and structural karyotypic variability has been investigated in the Indian muntjac skin fibroblasts "markerless" cell line MT and in its karyotypic variant MT(d) cultivated on the laminin 2/4 coated surface. In cell line MT preincubated in serum free medium for 2.5 and 1 h and then cultivated on the laminin-coated surface in the serum-containing medium for 1, 2 and 3 days, the character of cell distribution for the chromosome number has changed. These changes involve a significant decrease in frequency of cells with modal number of chromosomes, and an increase in frequency of cells with lower chromosomal number. Some new additional structural variants of the karyotype (SVK) appeared. The observed alterations seem to be due to disturbances of chromosome segregation and establishing a new advantageous balance karyotypic structure. The karyotypic variant MT(d) distinguished from MT by the increased number of dicentrics (telomeric associations) and cultivated under the same conditions showed no change in the character of cell distribution for the chromosome number. In cell line MT, the frequency of chromosomal aberrations did not change relative to control variants. In karyotypic variant MT(d) under the same conditions. the frequency of chromosomal aberrations significantly increases in 3 days mainly due to formation of dicentrics. These results confirm the conclusion that, similarly to aneuploidy, formation of dicentrics in "markerless" cell lines appears to be the way for cell population to adapt to unfavourable factors of the environment. Possible reasons for differences in the character of the numerical and structural karyotypic variability between cell line MT and its karyotypic variant MT(d) are discussed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]