These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Empirically derived composite measures of surgical performance.
    Author: Staiger DO, Dimick JB, Baser O, Fan Z, Birkmeyer JD.
    Journal: Med Care; 2009 Feb; 47(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 19169124.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Individual quality measures have significant limitations for assessing surgical performance. Despite growing interest in composite measures, empirically-based methods for combining multiple domains of surgical quality are not well established. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a composite measure of surgical performance that best describes variation in hospital mortality rates and forecasts future performance. RESEARCH DESIGN: Using the national Medicare claims database, we identified all patients undergoing aortic valve replacement in 2000 to 2001 (n = 53,120). To serve as input variables, we identified hospital-level predictors of mortality with aortic valve replacement, including hospital volume, complication rates, and mortality with other procedures. Hospital-specific predicted mortality rates were then determined using Bayesian-derived modeling techniques and assessed against subsequent hospital mortality (2002-2003). RESULTS: Our composite measure explained 78% of the variation in aortic valve replacement mortality rates (2000-2001). The most important input variables were hospital volume, mortality with aortic valve replacement, and mortality for other high-risk cardiac procedures. The composite measure forecasted 70% of future hospital-level variation in mortality rates (2002-2003), and was substantially better in this regard than individual measures. Hospitals scoring in the bottom quintile on the composite measure in 2000 to 2001 had 2-fold higher mortality rates in 2002 to 2003 than hospitals in the top quintile (adjusted odds ratio, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.73-2.23). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with individual surgical quality indicators, empirically derived composite measures are superior in explaining variation in hospital mortality rates and in forecasting future performance. Such measures could be useful for public reporting, value-based purchasing, or benchmarking for quality improvement purposes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]