These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: An autoanti-Kp b immunoglobulin M that simulates antigen suppression.
    Author: Bosco A, Xenocostas A, Kinney J, Cadwell CM, Zimring JC.
    Journal: Transfusion; 2009 Apr; 49(4):750-6. PubMed ID: 19170996.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Patients may present with an antibody against a blood group antigen, a negative direct antiglobulin test (DAT), and a null phenotype. Typically, this represents an alloantibody in a null individual. However, on occasion, the antibody disappears coincident with conversion to a positive red blood cell (RBC) phenotype. This has been called antigen loss, antigen suppression, or weakened antigenicity. Herein, a unique serologic profile that mimics this pattern, when in fact antigen loss did not occur, is described. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: RBCs and serum were analyzed using a gel microtyping system and flow cytometry. Genomic DNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction and sequenced. RESULTS: Initially, an anti-Kp(b) was detected in MTS gel, RBCs typed K-k-Kp(b-), and the DAT was negative for immunoglobulin G (IgG). Later, the anti-Kp(b) disappeared and RBCs phenotyped as K-k+Kp(b+). Analysis of initial specimens by flow cytometry identified an immunoglobulin M (IgM) anti-Kp(b) with a positive IgM-specific DAT; eluates contained an anti-Kp(b) at immediate spin. Supporting the presence of the Kell glycoprotein, RBCs agglutinated with anti-Js(b). Sequencing showed homozygosity for Kp(b) with no mutations surrounding the Kp(b) polymorphism. CONCLUSION: In antigen loss, antibody masking is excluded by a negative DAT. However, because typical DAT reagent does not detect IgM, such reasoning was inaccurate in the current case. In addition, an anti-Kp(b) resulted in RBCs typing k-, even though no anti-k was detected. Overall, this case suggests that an IgM may mask adjacent epitopes and illustrates the potential to mistake a non-IgG autoantibody as antigen loss.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]