These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Partial ossicular reconstruction: comparison of three different prostheses in clinical and experimental studies.
    Author: Neudert M, Zahnert T, Lasurashvili N, Bornitz M, Lavcheva Z, Offergeld C.
    Journal: Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 19174710.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the reconstruction results of a long incus process defect using 3 different partial ossicular replacement prostheses (PORP). STUDY DESIGN: Temporal bone experiments and retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. EXPERIMENTAL MATERIAL AND PATIENTS: The experimental study was performed on 18 temporal bones; 66 patients with retraction pockets, chronic otitis media with or without cholesteatoma. INTERVENTIONS: Ossiculoplasty using 3 different PORP: titanium angle prosthesis, autologous incus interposition, and titanium clip prosthesis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Laser Doppler vibrometry in temporal bones measured transmission properties of the PORP. Patients were retrospectively assessed up to 5 years after surgery. Audiologic data were analyzed for preoperative and postoperative air conduction and air-bone gap at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz. Statistical analyses compared the outcome in the experimental and clinical setting. RESULTS: Experimentally, the titanium PORP showed similar transmission properties because the overall difference to the intact specimen was -4.14 +/- 0.59 dB for the titanium angle prosthesis and -4.61 +/- 0.57 dB for the titanium clip prosthesis. The transmission after an autologous incus interposition was significantly worse (-9.32 +/- 0.39 dB, p < or = 0.001) compared with the other prostheses. Patients' mean postoperative air-bone gap was 25.5 +/- 1.2 dB and less than 20 dB in at least 66% of cases without any significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: In the clinical setting, the confounding factors that influence the acoustic outcome after partial ossiculoplasty obscure the prosthesis-related transmission factors that can otherwise be derived in the experimental setting. The results do not generally favor the use of 1 specific prosthesis, rather they suggest that the correct choice of a prosthesis be based on the anatomic and pathophysiologic conditions found in the individual patient.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]