These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Asynchronous (segmental early) relaxation impairs left ventricular filling in patients with coronary artery disease and normal systolic function.
    Author: Vanoverschelde JL, Wijns W, Michel X, Cosyns J, Detry JM.
    Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Nov 01; 18(5):1251-8. PubMed ID: 1918702.
    Abstract:
    Asynchronous segmental early relaxation, defined as a localized early segmental outward motion of the left ventricular endocardium during isovolumetric relaxation, has been associated with an altered left ventricular relaxation rate. To determine whether asynchronous segmental early relaxation also results in impaired left ventricular filling, early diastolic ventricular wall motion and Doppler-derived left ventricular filling indexes were examined in 25 patients with documented coronary artery disease and normal systolic function. Patients were further classified into two groups according to the presence (n = 15, group 1) or absence (n = 10, group 2) of asynchronous early relaxation at left ventriculography. A third group of 10 age-matched normal subjects served as a control group. No differences were observed between the two patient groups with coronary artery disease with respect to age, gender distribution, heart rate, left ventricular systolic and diastolic pressures or extent and severity of coronary artery disease. No differences in transmitral filling dynamics were observed between group 2 patients and age-matched control subjects. Conversely, group 1 patients had significantly lower peak early filling velocities (44 +/- 11 vs. 58 +/- 11 cm/s, p less than 0.01), larger atrial filling fraction (45 +/- 4% vs. 38 +/- 4%, p less than 0.001), lower ratio of early to late transmitral filling velocities (0.6 +/- 0.08 vs. 0.99 +/- 0.18, p less than 0.001) and a longer isovolumetric relaxation period (114 +/- 12 vs. 90 +/- 6 ms, p less than 0.001) compared with group 2 patients and control subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]