These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Muscle strength and pressor response.
    Author: Gonzales JU, Thompson BC, Thistlethwaite JR, Harper AJ, Scheuermann BW.
    Journal: Int J Sports Med; 2009 May; 30(5):320-4. PubMed ID: 19199216.
    Abstract:
    The purpose of this study was to determine if muscle strength influences the hyperemic response to dynamic exercise. Men with low (n=8) and high (n=9) maximal forearm strength performed dynamic handgrip exercise as the same absolute workload increased in a ramp function (0.5 kg x min (-1)). Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured instantaneously by ultrasound Doppler and blood pressure was measured by auscultation. The pressor response to exercise was greater (P<0.05) for low strength men at workloads >1.5 kg allowing volumetric FBF (ml x min (-1)) and vascular conductance to increase in proportion to absolute workload similar to high strength men. When FBF was expressed relative to forearm volume (ml x min (-1).100 ml (-1)) the hyperemic response to exercise (slope of relative FBF vs. workload) was greater in low strength men (3.2+/-1.5 vs. 1.7+/-0.4 ml x min (-1).100 ml (-1) x kg (-1), P<0.05) as was relative FBF at workloads >1.5 kg. However, when relative FBF was compared across relative work intensity, no difference was found between low and high strength groups. Together, these findings suggest men with low strength require a greater pressor response to match blood flow to exercise intensity as compared to high strength men.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]