These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Senescence-related changes in nitrogen in fine roots: mass loss affects estimation.
    Author: Kunkle JM, Walters MB, Kobe RK.
    Journal: Tree Physiol; 2009 May; 29(5):715-23. PubMed ID: 19203982.
    Abstract:
    The fate of nitrogen (N) in senescing fine roots has broad implications for whole-plant N economies and ecosystem N cycling. Studies to date have generally shown negligible changes in fine root N per unit root mass during senescence. However, unmeasured loss of mobile non-N constituents during senescence could lead to underestimates of fine root N loss. For N fertilized and unfertilized potted seedlings of Populus tremuloides Michx., Acer rubrum L., Acer saccharum Marsh. and Betula alleghaniensis Britton, we predicted that the fine roots would lose mass and N during senescence. We estimated mass loss as the product of changes in root mass per length and root length between live and recently dead fine roots. Changes in root N were compared among treatments on uncorrected mass, length (which is independent of changes in mass per length), calcium (Ca) and corrected mass bases and by evaluating the relationships of dead root N as a function of live root N, species and fertilization treatments. Across species, from live to dead roots, mass decreased 28-40%, N uncorrected for mass loss increased 10-35%, N per length decreased 5-16%, N per Ca declined 14-48% and N corrected for mass declined 12-28%. Given the magnitude of senescence-related root mass loss and uncertainties about Ca dynamics in senescing roots, N loss corrected for mass loss is likely the most reliable estimate of N loss. We re-evaluated the published estimates of N changes during root senescence based on our values of mass loss and found an average of 28% lower N in dead roots than in fine roots. Despite uncertainty about the contributions of resorption, leaching and microbial immobilization to the net loss of N during root senescence, live root N was a strong and proportional predictor of dead root N across species and fertilization treatments, suggesting that live root N alone could be used to predict the contributions of senescing fine roots to whole-plant N economies and N cycling.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]