These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Stentless porcine valves in the right ventricular outflow tract: improved durability?
    Author: Hawkins JA, Sower CT, Lambert LM, Kouretas PC, Burch PT, Kaza AK, Puchalski MD, Yetman AT.
    Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Apr; 35(4):600-4; discussion 604-5. PubMed ID: 19211257.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Stentless porcine valves are commonly used for aortic valve replacement in adults, yet their long-term performance in the right ventricular (RV) outflow tract is unknown. We evaluated intermediate-term performance of stentless porcine valves in the RV outflow tract in 150 children and adults over a 10-year period. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data on all patients undergoing placement of a pulmonary valve or RV-PA conduit with a stentless porcine prosthesis (>/=19 mm) from 1998 to 2008. Valvar function was assessed with echocardiography. Freedom from reintervention (explantation or catheter-based intervention) was determined by actuarial methods. RESULTS: A stentless porcine prosthesis was placed in the pulmonary position in 150 patients with a median weight and age of 50.1 kg (range 9.8-127) and 15.8 years (range 1.4-55), respectively. There were three early deaths (2%) and no late deaths. Actuarial freedom from reintervention was 100% at 1 year and 95.5% at 5 years. Peak transvalvar gradient at 1 and 5 years was 13+/-12 mmHg and 25+/-11 mmHg, respectively. At last follow-up no patient had severe insufficiency (PI), five patients had moderate PI and the remainder mild or no PI. CONCLUSIONS: Stentless porcine valves function well in the pulmonary position over the intermediate-term and are associated with low rates of reintervention in patients requiring a >19 mm valve or valved conduit. Longer-term follow-up and comparison with other alternatives will be necessary to determine if these valves are superior to commonly used allograft or bovine jugular venous valved conduits.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]