These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Field evaluation of thermal and chemical desorption BTEX radial diffusive sampler radiello compared with active (pumped) samplers for ambient air measurements.
    Author: Cocheo C, Boaretto C, Pagani D, Quaglio F, Sacco P, Zaratin L, Cottica D.
    Journal: J Environ Monit; 2009 Feb; 11(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 19212585.
    Abstract:
    The performance of two types of radiello diffusive samplers, filled with a thermally desorbable adsorbent (graphitised carbon Carbograph 4) and with a solvent desorbable adsorbent (activated charcoal), respectively, have been evaluated for the monitoring of BTEX in ambient air, by comparison with active (pumped) samplers. A two year survey was carried out in Padua, a medium-sized town, in a traffic site, close to a busy crossroad. The concentrations of BTEX were measured for 15 campaigns, during which four series of radial diffusive samplers were exposed for 2 day, 7 day, 10 day and 14 day time periods, respectively. Every series of chemical desorption samplers included three replicates; thermal desorption samplers included six replicates, three of them filled with freshly conditioned cartridges and three filled with regenerated cartridges. No significant difference in the levels measured either by new or by regenerated cartridges has been found. During three campaigns (summer 2004, winter and spring 2005) two active (pumped) samplers were added for each sampling period. The diffusive uptake rates have been calculated and modelled under various conditions of concentration, temperature and exposure time. The effects of the environmental factors on the performances of both solvent and thermally desorbable samplers have been evaluated. The repeatability of the whole measurement process (sampling and analysis) was calculated for every sampling duration. The comparison of concentration levels measured by diffusive and active sampling methods shows correlation coefficients R >or= 0.98 (p<0.01) for all the compounds. The uncertainty of the diffusive sampling method under field conditions, using active sampling as the reference method, has been assessed according to the ISO 13752 requirements. On field relative expanded uncertainty for benzene has been found below 20%.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]