These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Intraindividual assessment of the thoracic aorta using contrast and non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Author: von Tengg-Kobligk H, Ley-Zaporozhan J, Henninger V, Grünberg KM, Giesel FL, Böckler D, Krummenauer F, Kauczor HU, Ley S.
    Journal: Rofo; 2009 Mar; 181(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 19229788.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To avoid intravenous contrast media application, new MRA sequences using inherent blood contrast are available. The clinical use of these non-contrast-enhanced MRA (non-CE-MRA) sequences is still limited for the aorta. Thus, the goal was to compare a standard CE-MRA with a non-CE-MRA for the thoracic aorta. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained. CE-MRA and non-CE-MRA (1.5 T) were performed in the same 50 healthy volunteers (mean age: 48). CE-MRA: GRE-Turbo-Flash-3D (1.2 x 1.2 x 1.6 mm (3)), 0.15 mmol Gd/kg, TA 22 +/- 2 sec. Non-CE-MRA: Respiratory-and cardiac-gated, T 2-prepared 3D-trueFISP (1.2 x 1.2 x 1.3 mm (3)), TA 14 +/- 5 min. Assessment included (3 readers, consensus): image quality (sharpness of vessel wall, signal homogeneity, artifacts) at the ascending aorta, arch, descending aorta and supra-aortic vessels. RESULTS: The image quality in the ascending aorta was rated 'excellent' in 78 %, 'moderate' in 22 %, 'poor' in 0 % for non-CE-MRA versus 22 %, 50 %, and 28 % for CE-MRA (Cohen's kappa = 29 %, McNemar p < 0.001). In a comparison of non-CE-MRA versus CE-MRA, the aortic arch and descending aorta showed no significant difference (kappa = 58 %/p = 0.250 and kappa = 100 %/p = 1.000, respectively). Supra-aortic vessels were rated 'excellent' 45 %/ 49 %, 'moderate' 30 %/ 49 % and 'poor' 13 %/ 2 %, 12 % of supra-aortic vessels were visualized < 1 cm at non-CE-MRA. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic image quality of the thoracic aorta can be achieved without application of intravenous contrast media. Images of the aortic root using ECG-gated non-CE-MRA are superior to standard CE-MRA. This technique might be applicable in NSF patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]