These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A single-institution experience with eight CD117-positive primary extragastrointestinal stromal tumors: critical appraisal and a comparison with their gastrointestinal counterparts.
    Author: Goh BK, Chow PK, Kesavan SM, Yap WM, Chung YF, Wong WK.
    Journal: J Gastrointest Surg; 2009 Jun; 13(6):1094-8. PubMed ID: 19238492.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) arising from outside the gut wall also termed extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs) are reported to be rare. Presently, their pathogenesis remains controversial, and recently, it has been proposed that EGISTs may be the result of extensive extramural growth of GISTs which lose contact with the gut wall. This study presents a single-institution experience with eight EGISTs and compares their clinicopathological features with mural GISTs in order to determine further insight to their possible origin. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2008, 156 patients with pathologically proven CD117-positive primary GISTs were retrospectively reviewed. Eight tumors were identified as EGISTs, 104 were gastric GISTs, and 44 were small-bowel GISTs. Mural GISTs were classified as extramural or intra/transmural according to their gross pattern of growth. RESULTS: There were five male and three female patients with a median age of 58 years (range, 42-81 years). All patients were symptomatic, and the tumors were located in the greater omentum (n = 2), lesser sac (n = 2), lesser omentum, retroperitoneum, small-bowel mesentery, and pancreas. The median tumor size was 140 mm (range, 55 to 220 mm). Seven of eight EGISTs were found to be in close association to the adjacent gut wall. Pathological examination demonstrated that two tumors demonstrated focal involvement of the muscularis propria of the adjacent gut wall. Four tumors demonstrated tumor abutting or adherent to the serosa but no muscle involvement and one tumor was separated from the serosa. Comparison between the clinicopathological features of EGISTs with extramural GISTs and intra/transmural GISTs demonstrated that EGISTs were significantly larger [140 range (55-220) mm vs 80 (5-260) mm vs 50 (15-190) mm, P = 0.049, P < 0.001 respectively]. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of true EGISTs is rare. Most cases demonstrate some form of communication or contact with the gut wall, and EGISTs are significantly larger than extramural or intra/transmural GIST. These observations suggest that most, if not all, cases of EGISTs are likely to represent mural GISTs with extensive extramural growth with eventual loss of contact with the muscle layer of the gut.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]