These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Accuracy of 64-slice coronary CT angiography in predicting percentage diameter stenosis.
    Author: Harish A, Khatri P, Priyadarshini H, Selvakumar S, Arunkumar N, Sivakumar A, Ezhilan J, Mullasari AS.
    Journal: Indian Heart J; 2008; 60(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 19242005.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT coronary angiogram in measuring the percentage diameter stenosis compared to invasive angiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: 100 consecutive patients with more than 50% stenosis in at least one major coronary artery measured by 64-slice CT angiogram were included in the study. Patients with atrial fibrillation, history of allergy to contrast agent, acute coronary syndrome, renal insufficiency, history of previous coronary bypass surgery or percutaneous transluminal coronary stent, heart rate more than 70 per minute at the time of scan in spite of beta-blocker therapy, and calcium score >2000 Agaston units were not included in the study. 15-segment American Heart Association classification was used, and segments were compared using qualitative angiography. 192 segments (12.80%) could not be assessed due to poor image quality. The major cause for poor image quality was dense calcification precluding the luminal assessment (60.42%). Comparing the maximal percentage diameter stenosis by 64-slice CT versus invasive angiogram, the Spearman correlation coefficient between the two modalities was 0.788 and p value was <0.001. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference in percentage stenosis of 2.1 +/- 16.22%. A total of 91.97% (401 of 436) of segments were within 1.96 standard deviations. CONCLUSION: This study shows that 64-slice CT coronary angiogram is accurate in detecting percentage diameter stenosis compared to coronary angiogram if the image quality is good. Calcifications and motion artifacts are the main culprits of poor image quality.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]