These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Non-Hodgkin's primitive lymphoma of the testis: long-term prognosis associated with treatment combining systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy]. Author: Sénéchal C, Saint F, Petit T, Petit J. Journal: Prog Urol; 2009 Mar; 19(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 19268261. Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term prognosis of a retrospective series of primitive malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (MNHL) of the testicle treated by orchidectomy and combined systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1992 to 2006, eight consecutive patients were treated for a primitive MNHL of the testicle (stages : IA [n=1], IEA [n=5], IIEA [n=1], IVEA [n=1]) and retrospectively analyzed. All of these tumors were highly malignant. The average age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 64 years old (46-78). All the patients benefited from an enlarged orchidectomy and received a combination of systemic and intrathecal CHOP and VACP chemotherapy. Six patients finished with some locoregional radiotherapy and three had cerebral radiotherapy. RESULTS: Patients were treated over an average period of 90.5 months (12 to 168 months). Five patients (62.5%) responded successfully, one patient had a cerebral relapse stabilized by a second course of chemotherapy. Three patients died, one from septic shock during chemotherapy (IVEA stage), another from mesenteric infarction (IAE stage) and the third from acute coronary thrombosis while in complete remission. CONCLUSION: In spite of a reputedly bleak prognosis, primitive MNHL of the testicle treated with a combination of systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy would seem to be associated with a good specific long-term survival. Unfortunately, the rate of mortality linked to chemotherapy is significant (close to 12.5% in our series) and would not appear to entirely protect against cerebral recurrence.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]