These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Discussion on the application of UV/H(2)O(2), O(3) and O(3)/UV processes as technologies for sewage reuse considering the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products.
    Author: Kim IH, Yamashita N, Kato Y, Tanaka H.
    Journal: Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(5):945-55. PubMed ID: 19273893.
    Abstract:
    The applicability of O(3), UV/H(2)O(2) and O(3)/UV treatment processes as technologies for water reuse considering pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) removal was investigated. Electrical energies required for the effective removal of various PPCPs in secondary effluent were 0.09 kWh/m(3), 0.54 kWh/m(3) and 1.09 kWh/m(3) for O(3), UV/H(2)O(2) and O(3)/UV treatments, respectively, showing that O(3) treatment is the most cost-effective treatment option for the PPCPs removal. O(3) treatment showed the effective PPCPs removal at O(3) dose of 6 mg/L; however, the formation of bromate is expected for O(3) treatment using O(3) dose of more than 4 mg/L. In particular, bromate formation will be a critical issue when the reclaimed water is used for direct/indirect potable reuses. Therefore, in order to suppress the bromate formation as well as achieve the effective PPCPs removal, O(3)/UV treatment will be recommended. UV/H(2)O(2) treatment will be also a profitable treatment method because no bromate will be formed during the process. The evaluation for ecological risk of PPCPs by the applied processes showed that all the processes could decrease the ecological risk caused by parent PPCPs considerably. This means that the investigated treatment processes can play an important role in reducing unpredictable side effects caused by PPCPs in the aquatic environment.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]