These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Provider organization performance assessment utilizing diabetes physician recognition program.
    Author: Wall B, Chiao E, Plauschinat CA, Miner PA, Jackson JH, Humphrey B.
    Journal: Am J Manag Care; 2009 Feb; 15(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 19284810.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the level of care in a large provider organization with respect to the Diabetes Physician Recognition Program (DPRP) standards of care and describe treatment patterns, diabetes-related complications, and achievement of clinical goals among patients stratified by glycemic control levels. STUDY DESIGN: Observational, retrospective, chart review study assessing care among patients with diabetes. METHODS: Diabetic patients aged > or =5 years who were prescribed insulin or oral hypoglycemics/antihyperglycemics for at least 12 months by 1 of 14 DPRP-participating physicians from the provider organization were eligible. A sample of patient medical charts was collected. Descriptive statistics were generated to assess demographic and clinical variables, with subanalyses for patients in the 3 glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) cohorts. Data were used to describe the demographics, disease prevalence, comorbidities, clinical outcomes, and treatment patterns of the study population. Results were assessed according to national treatment guidelines. RESULTS: Almost all DPRP recognition measures were met and/or exceeded. More than 90% of patients received appropriate assessments. The majority achieved the A1C, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein control levels recommended by national treatment guidelines. Patients with multiple comorbidities had worse levels of control, with only 14.3% of patients achieving all 3 treatment goals. Nearly 30% of patients had diabetes-related complications, most commonly kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in control and treatment patterns exist in patients with varying levels of glycemic control. Opportunities exist to improve diabetes care through goal attainment. Further research is needed to determine whether specific measures of care correlate with levels of glycemic control.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]