These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Effects of patient-prosthesis mismatch on postoperative early mortality in isolated aortic stenosis. Author: Rabus MB, Kirali K, Kayalar N, Mataraci I, Yanartas M, Ulusoy-Bozbuga N, Yakut C. Journal: J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jan; 18(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 19301549. Abstract: BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Small valve size and patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) generate high postoperative transvalvular gradients and may decrease both early and long-term survival. The study aim was to evaluate whether mismatch affected early mortality after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for isolated aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS: A total of 701 patients (437 males, 264 females; mean age 53.3 +/- 15.1 years; range: 14-84 years) with pure AS underwent AVR at the authors' institution between 1985 and 2005. The majority of patients (92%) received a mechanical valve. PPM was considered severe if the indexed effective orifice area was < or =0.65 cm2/m2, and moderate if > 0.65 but < or = 0.85 cm2/m2. RESULTS: Moderate-severe PPM was present in 47% of patients, and severe PPM in 13%. The early mortality was 5.4% (n=38). Multivariate analysis revealed age > or = 70 years (p < 0.001), female gender (p = 0.04) and severe PPM (p = 0.003) as independent predictors of early mortality. Moderate mismatch was not a predictor of early mortality on both univariate and multivariate analysis. Left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < or = 40%) was a risk factor for early mortality only in patients with severe PPM. CONCLUSION: Patient-prosthesis mismatch should be prevented in patients undergoing AVR for isolated AS, especially in those with left ventricular dysfunction.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]