These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: comparison between a Gd-BOPTA- and a Gd-DTPA-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo sequence and a non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free-precession sequence.
    Author: Nassenstein K, Breuckmann F, Hunold P, Barkhausen J, Schlosser T.
    Journal: Acta Radiol; 2009 May; 50(4):406-11. PubMed ID: 19308763.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated that the administration of contrast agents is advantageous in magnetic resonance coronary angiography (MRCA). PURPOSE: To compare a non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free-precession (SSFP) with a contrast-enhanced inversion recovery spoiled gradient-echo (IR-GE) sequence using two different contrast agents for MRCA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers were examined on a 1.5T MR scanner. For non-contrast-enhanced MRCA, a breath-hold three-dimensional (3D) SSFP sequence (repetition/echo time [TR/TE] 3.9/1.7 ms, flip angle [FA] 65 degrees) was used. Contrast-enhanced MRCA was performed repetitively in two imaging sessions over 30 min after injection of 0.2 mmol/kg body weight gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) or gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) using a breath-hold 3D IR-GE sequence (TR/TE 4.1/1.7 ms, FA 15 degrees). The signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of the coronary arteries, as well as the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) between coronary arteries and perivascular tissue, were calculated for all images. Blood T (1) values were repetitively estimated over 30 min using an SSFP sequence with incrementally increasing inversion times (TR/TE 2.4/1.0 ms, FA 50 degrees). RESULTS: Gd-BOPTA-enhanced images showed significantly (P<0.05) higher SNR and CNR compared to Gd-DTPA-enhanced images for all times after contrast injection (SNR: 1 min post injection [PI] 26.4+/-4.2 vs. 16.2+/-3.1; CNR: 1 min PI 21.4+/-3.7 vs. 13.2+/-2.6). Compared to the SSFP images, the Gd-BOPTA-enhanced images showed higher CNR values for all times after injection (1 min PI 21.4+/-3.7 vs. 13.8+/-5.5; P<0.05), whereas the Gd-DTPA-enhanced images did not (1 min PI 13.2+/-2.6 vs. 13.8+/-5.5; P>0.05). Blood T (1) estimates were not significantly different for either agent 1 min after administration (P>0.05), but they were significantly lower for Gd-BOPTA (P<0.05) from 7 to 25 min after injection. CONCLUSION: Compared to non-contrast-enhanced SSFP images, only Gd-BOPTA-enhanced images show a significantly improved contrast between the coronary arteries and the surrounding tissue.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]