These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Waiting time and assessment of patient satisfaction in a large reference emergency department: a prospective cohort study, France.
    Author: Pitrou I, Lecourt AC, Bailly L, Brousse B, Dauchet L, Ladner J.
    Journal: Eur J Emerg Med; 2009 Aug; 16(4):177-82. PubMed ID: 19318959.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To assess patient satisfaction in a French Emergency Department (ED) and to determine factors associated with dissatisfaction. METHODS: From July 2003 to February 2004, a prospective cohort study was conducted in an ED (Elbeuf Reference Hospital, Upper-Normandy region). Baseline data collection was performed during individual interview at inclusion. Waiting time in the ED was recorded. Patient satisfaction was assessed by telephone 1 month later. Questions included assessment of overall satisfaction and three different areas of satisfaction: quality of reception, patient-doctor communication, and delays. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five patients were included, 146 patients (88.5%) responded to the telephone follow-up. We found high levels of satisfaction in the ED (89.7%). Highest satisfaction rate (92.5%) was for reception. Lower satisfaction rates were reported for waiting times (72.6%) and medical information provided by physicians (71.9%). The mean total time spent was 149.9 min (median=133.5). In multivariate analysis, waiting time was the unique independent determinant of patient dissatisfaction: second quartile odds ratio (OR)=0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI)=(0.06-2.66), third quartile OR=1.45; 95% CI=(0.32-6.47), last quartile OR=2.69; 95% CI=(0.65-11.08); ptrend=0.04. CONCLUSION: Elevated waiting times appeared as the unique independent risk factor of patient dissatisfaction. Information on delays and reasons for this delay could be systematically communicated to patients attending EDs; it could be an effective strategy to reduce perceived waiting times and improve patient satisfaction.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]