These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Clinical implications of orbital volume change in the management of isolated and zygomaticomaxillary complex-associated orbital floor injuries.
    Author: Tahernia A, Erdmann D, Follmar K, Mukundan S, Grimes J, Marcus JR.
    Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Mar; 123(3):968-975. PubMed ID: 19319062.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Orbital floor injuries can occur in isolation or in association with zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Volumetric computed tomographic measurements of affected orbits are investigated for utility in guiding management in these two groups. METHODS: The medical records of all patients with craniomaxillofacial injuries (2003 to 2005) were reviewed. Of 522 total patients, 45 patients had isolated orbital floor fractures, 13 of whom underwent repair (29 percent), and 64 had zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures, 36 of whom underwent reconstruction (56 percent) and 10 of whom underwent orbital floor repair (16 percent). Radiographic criteria for floor exploration included 50 percent area fracture in isolated injuries and 10-mm estimated zygomaticomaxillary complex compression in zygomaticomaxillary complex-associated floor injuries. Volume measurements of the affected orbits were obtained and compared with the uninjured contralateral orbit. RESULTS: Before treatment in the operative zygomaticomaxillary complex group, there was an average decrease in orbital volume of 18.3 percent. In the isolated orbital floor group, there was an average increase in orbital volume of 28.3 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Zygomaticomaxillary complex-associated orbital floor injuries can be compressive injuries associated with loss of volume, whereas isolated injuries generally result in volume expansion. Radiographic criteria are often considered in the decision to proceed with orbital floor exploration to avoid late enophthalmos. The literature suggests that a 20 percent change in orbital volume results in perceptible deformity. Therefore, a radiographic criterion of 50 percent floor area (28 percent volume increase) in isolated injuries may be too stringent; an estimated 10 mm of compression (18.3 percent volume change) is a reasonable operative criterion for floor exploration in zygomaticomaxillary complex-associated injuries.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]