These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Immunogenicity of native or pegylated E. coli and Erwinia asparaginases assessed by ELISA and surface plasmon resonance (SPR-biacore) assays of IgG antibodies (Ab) in sera from patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
    Author: Avramis VI, Avramis EV, Hunter W, Long MC.
    Journal: Anticancer Res; 2009 Jan; 29(1):299-302. PubMed ID: 19331165.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Therapeutic uses of asparaginases (ASNase) have been shown to elicit immune responses resulting in the development of potentially life-threatening human anti-bacterial antibodies (Ab). A robust screening enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect binding Ab(+) against ASNase has been developed and validated for therapeutic monitoring to support clinical trials. Recently, a protein chip bioassay (Biacore) was developed for the Ab of these proteins. These methods were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Biacore T-100 analyzer using a protein bioassay and an ELISA assay were used to determine the IgG immmuboglobulin Ab against ASNase in sera from 84 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients plus 6 controls (n=121 samples). These samples were characterized for anti-ASNase Ab neutralizing activity. Human E. coli ASNase, pegaspargase and Erwinase proteins were covalently coupled to the carboxy-methylated dextran matrix of a CM5 sensor chip (surface plasmon resonance, SPR). In the course of a nested experimental design, a wide range of human sera from patients who had obvious clinical allergic reactions after either native or pegaspargase treatments were tested. The data were fitted by a parametric logistic equation (+/-95% confidence interval, CI), which ranged from <3.0% to <14%. RESULTS: The specificity of Ab(+) was evaluated using "spiked" human IgG antibodies. Both assays provide near excellent linearity and sensitivity of response (<0.8 to <500 ratio and 1-3000 resonance units [RU]) of anti-ASNase Ab in human sera with low variance. The bioassay method was ten times more sensitive than the ELISA Ab assay. The lowest limit of quantification of Ab(+) ratio for the SPR assay was 0.6 whereas the upper limit of quantification was 3000 RU. The SPR assay results were in excellent accord with both the Ab(-) and the Ab(+). Ab(-) by the ELISA method (<1.003 ratio) was related to a mean RU value of 8.1. Despite the narrow range of ambiguity around the 1.1 Ab(+) ratio values, the majority of the specimens (93.2%) were determined to be Ab(+) by either ELISA or SPR determination. CONCLUSION: The vast majority (81/84 = 96.4%) of the IgG Ab(+) were neutralizing. The SPR Ab determination technique is reliable, accurate and more sensitive than the ELISA method.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]