These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Decoupling the influence of leaf and root hydraulic conductances on stomatal conductance and its sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit as soil dries in a drained loblolly pine plantation.
    Author: Domec JC, Noormets A, King JS, Sun G, McNulty SG, Gavazzi MJ, Boggs JL, Treasure EA.
    Journal: Plant Cell Environ; 2009 Aug; 32(8):980-91. PubMed ID: 19344336.
    Abstract:
    The study examined the relationships between whole tree hydraulic conductance (K(tree)) and the conductance in roots (K(root)) and leaves (K(leaf)) in loblolly pine trees. In addition, the role of seasonal variations in K(root) and K(leaf) in mediating stomatal control of transpiration and its response to vapour pressure deficit (D) as soil-dried was studied. Compared to trunk and branches, roots and leaves had the highest loss of conductivity and contributed to more than 75% of the total tree hydraulic resistance. Drought altered the partitioning of the resistance between roots and leaves. As soil moisture dropped below 50%, relative extractable water (REW), K(root) declined faster than K(leaf). Although K(tree) depended on soil moisture, its dynamics was tempered by the elongation of current-year needles that significantly increased K(leaf) when REW was below 50%. After accounting for the effect of D on g(s), the seasonal decline in K(tree) caused a 35% decrease in g(s) and in its sensitivity to D, responses that were mainly driven by K(leaf) under high REW and by K(root) under low REW. We conclude that not only water stress but also leaf phenology affects the coordination between K(tree) and g(s) and the acclimation of trees to changing environmental conditions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]