These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A prospective randomized split-mouth study comparing iliac onlay grafts in atrophied edentulous patients: covered with periosteum or a bioresorbable membrane.
    Author: Heberer S, Rühe B, Krekeler L, Schink T, Nelson JJ, Nelson K.
    Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 19397644.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: In this prospective study, solid monocortical iliac onlay grafts of the maxilla were randomly covered with a bioresorbable membrane and periosteum within the maxilla. Histologic specimens were analyzed by light microscopy after a healing period of three months and the rate of resorption of the grafts were measured. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients (9 females and 5 males), with a mean age of 56 years (range 25-72) underwent augmentation with avascular iliac onlay bone grafts. The grafts were randomly covered either with a bioresorbable membrane (MC) or periosteum (PC). Resorption was measured with a digital caliper at the microscrews (slashed circle 1.5 mm) used to fixate the graft. Histologic evaluation of the specimens derived from the graft with a trephine bur (slashed circle 2 mm) from the implant site at implant placement after a 3-month healing period. Statistical evaluation of the data was performed using Analysis of variance and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Clinical appearance of the augmented bone after 3 months showed a dense cortical layer with good vascular perfusion. Thirty-three sites in 13 patients (one dropped put) were analyzed histomorphometrically and showed an average of 46% newly formed bone with no significant difference between the groups (P=0.46). The mean resorption rate at 56 measured sites was 1.2 mm (range 0.3-3.4 mm) after 3 months, with no significant difference between the MC sites and the PC sites (P=0.38). DISCUSSION: Histomorphometry of new bone formation after 3 months demonstrates no significant difference between the PC and MC groups. Initialization of graft resorption can be seen after 3 months with no significant difference as to whether the graft was covered with a membrane or the periosteum. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that after avascular iliac bone grafting, the revascularization of the graft was sufficient after 3 months regardless of the graft coverage with no effect on the amount of initial resorption of the graft.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]