These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Clinical evaluation of three occlusal registration methods for guided closure contacts. Author: Kong CV, Yang YL, Maness WL. Journal: J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jul; 66(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 1941668. Abstract: This clinical study compared two occlusal registration methods (Occlusal Indicator Wax and Accufilm) with the T-Scan system for the identification of guided closure contacts. The patients were divided into two groups according to the centric relation-maximum intercuspation (CR-MIP) discrepancy and comparisons of guided closure contacts were performed with the paired methods. Wax and Accufilm materials were significantly different in their agreement on guided closure contacts. The T-Scan system demonstrated less of a disparity with both methods but more closely resembled the Occlusal Indicator Wax material. The CR-MIP slide also significantly affected the agreement between methods during identification of guided closure contacts.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]