These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Identification of insulin receptor systems: assessing the impact of model selection and measurement error on precision of parameter estimates using Monte Carlo study.
    Author: Hovorka R, Hilgertova J.
    Journal: J Theor Biol; 1991 Aug 07; 151(3):367-83. PubMed ID: 1943148.
    Abstract:
    An extensive Monte Carlo study has been carried out in order to study the effect of measurement error on the precision of parameter estimates of an insulin binding system. Hypothetical radioimmunoassay experiments were generated for insulin binding to erythrocytes. The design of experiments followed strictly the protocol of real experiments. Randomly generated error was added to the synthetic data. The standard technique, a weighted non-linear regression analysis, was employed to re-estimate parameters of a model of two receptor sites and a model of negative co-operativity. As the original parameter values were known, the differences between original and estimated values was studied for (a) measurement error in the range from 0-17%, (b) random initial estimates and (c) error-free non-specific binding. In addition, analytical estimates of parameter precision were compared with the true between-experiment variation of parameter estimates. At the measurement error of 12%, a one site model is recommended to estimate the high affinity population of the two sites model. Plausible results can be expected in 90% of experiments, the between-experiment variation being approximately 30%. The model of two receptor sites gives approximately two thirds of plausible results. The high affinity population can be estimated with the between-experiment variation of 40%, the low affinity population is virtually unidentifiable with the between-experiment variation of approximately 100% and parameter estimates biased to higher values. Only half of the results obtained from the model of negative co-operativity are plausible, the variation in parameter estimates ranges from 90-150% and estimates are biased to higher values. At the level of 12% measurement error, random initial estimates do not significantly affect the estimation process, provided initial estimates are selected from a feasible range. At the same measurement error, the error-free non-specific binding does not improve the results, indicating that the mean of six replicates may be taken as a reliable estimate of non-specific binding. The analytical estimates of the coefficient of variation systematically underestimates the true between-experiments coefficient of variation, the difference has been found to be about 50%.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]