These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Left ventricular performance in aortic valve replacement.
    Author: Tanoue Y, Maeda T, Oda S, Baba H, Oishi Y, Tokunaga S, Nakashima A, Tominaga R.
    Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 9(2):255-9. PubMed ID: 19443490.
    Abstract:
    We analyzed the mid-term left ventricular (LV) performance after aortic valve replacement (AVR). We measured LV contractility (end-systolic elastance: Ees), afterload (effective arterial elastance: Ea) and efficiency (ventriculoarterial coupling: Ea/Ees; ratio of stroke work and pressure-volume area: SW/PVA) based on transthoracic echocardiography data obtained before, after and approximately 1 year after isolated AVR in 263 patients with aortic stenosis (AS group; n=116), aortic regurgitation (AR group; n=93) or aortic stenosis and regurgitation (ASR group; n=54). The LV volume was calculated by the Teichholz M-mode method. Ees and Ea were approximated as follows: Ees=mean blood pressure/minimal LV volume; Ea=systolic blood pressure/(maximal LV volume-minimal LV volume). Thereafter, Ea/Ees and SW/PVA were calculated. Arterial blood pressure was measured using manchette methods. Ees and Ea decreased after AVR in the AS group, but increased in the AR group. Ea/Ees and SW/PVA worsened after AVR in the AR group, but improved during a 1-year period after AVR in all groups. Contrasting effects of AVR on LV contractility and afterload between AS and AR were clearly demonstrated. The mid-term LV contractility and efficiency after AVR were excellent and satisfactory. However, LV efficiency worsened early after AVR in AR patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]