These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Risk factors for death in 224 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.
    Author: Hiraoka A, Horiike N, Yamashita Y, Koizumi Y, Doi H, Yamamoto Y, Ichikawa S, Hasebe A, Yano M, Miyamoto Y, Ninomiya T, Ootani H, Takamura K, Kawasaki H, Otomi Y, Kogame M, Sogabe I, Ishimaru Y, Kashihara K, Miyagawa M, Hirooka M, Hiasa Y, Matsuura B, Michitaka K, Onji M.
    Journal: Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(89):213-7. PubMed ID: 19453060.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND/AIMS: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been reported as effective therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), however, few have described methods for predicting prognosis, especially in patients treated by repeated TACE. To determine risk factors for death and try to predict the prognosis, we evaluated clinical data. METHODOLOGY: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical parameters of 224 patients with unresectable HCC treated with repeated TACE from January 1997 to December 2007. TACE was repeated when recurrence was diagnosed by tumor marker elevation and/or dynamic computed tomography findings. Factors affecting survival were evaluated using multivariate analysis after univariate analysis. Next, we combined the score for each significant factor into a single prognostic score and added up the positive factors in each case, then analyzed the significance of prognosis, after which the results were compared with other prognostic scoring systems. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that bilobular HCC, alpha-fetoprotein (> or = 400 ng/ml), tumor invasion of the portal vein, tumor size (> or = 10 cm), and albumin (< 2.8 g/dl) were related to poor prognosis, and developed a prognostic scoring system from those. According to that score, patients were classified into 5 groups. CONCLUSION: Our scoring system was easily performed and the results showed that repeated TACE should not be administered to patients with scores of 3 or more.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]