These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Cortical osteoclasts are less sensitive to etidronate than trabecular osteoclasts. Author: Chappard D, Petitjean M, Alexandre C, Vico L, Minaire P, Riffat G. Journal: J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Jul; 6(7):673-80. PubMed ID: 1950672. Abstract: Acute osteoporosis after spinal cord injury is related to an early increase in osteoclastic resorption. Healthy subjects subjected to bed rest similarly increase their osteoclast number in trabecular bone. Bisphosphonates possess a highly antiosteoclastic activity. The effects of a 120 day bed rest period, with or without etidronate therapy on cortical bone were measured in 15 subjects. Cortical thickness and cortical porosity were measured on transiliac bone biopsies taken before and after the bed rest period. Osteoclasts were detected histochemically and were counted with a semiautomatic image analyzer. Cortical thickness, cortical porosity, and cortical osteoclast number were not significantly modified in subjects submitted to bed rest alone. In the etidronate-treated patients, cortical bone mass parameters were also found to be unaffected, but the most striking feature was that the osteoclast number was unchanged. Trabecular osteoclasts, on the contrary, were increased in the untreated subjects (+95.2%) but decreased in the treated subjects (-78%). Bone cells may have heterogeneous responses according to their trabecular or cortical location. Cortical osteoclasts seem to be unaffected by etidronate therapy.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]