These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Diagnosis, treatment and medical evaluation of sinusitis and nasal polyp in aircrew].
    Author: Xu X, Zhang Y, Ma X, Jin Z.
    Journal: Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 23(5):194-6, 200. PubMed ID: 19522183.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To sum up the experiences of diagnosis, treatment and medical evaluation of sinusitis and nasal polyp in aircrew. METHOD: Ninety three aircrew with sinusitis and nasal polyp were included in the study. RESULT: There were 11 cases with acute sinusitis and 82 cases with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyp. Of the 82 cases, there were 46 cases in class I (including 39 cases with symptoms and signs on ground in Ia, 7 cases only with signs in Ib), 36 cases in class II (no symptoms on ground but with symptoms of secondary barotraumas in flight, including 14 cases with secondary barosinusitis in IIa, 13 cases with secondary barotrauma in IIb, 9 cases with secondary barosinusitis and barotrauma in IIc ). Of the 82 cases, there were 24 cases in 1 stage of type I, 38 cases in 2 stage of type I, 7 cases in 3 stage of type I, 2 cases in 1 stage of type II, 6 cases in 2 stage of type II, 3 cases in 3 stage of type II, 2 cases in type III. Eighty four cases continued their flying jobs and 9 cases were permanently grounded. CONCLUSION: Flying safe can be endangered by sinusitis and nasal polyp alone or with its secondary barotraumas. Chronic sinusitis and nasal polyp complicated with barotraumas are important causation for medical grounding. The aircrew with sinusitis and nasal polyp will be allowed to continue their flying jobs only after getting well curative effect and normal gas pressures of ear and nasal sinus.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]