These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Determination of the best electrode position for recording of the diaphragm compound muscle action potential.
    Author: Dionne A, Parkes A, Engler B, Watson BV, Nicolle MW.
    Journal: Muscle Nerve; 2009 Jul; 40(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 19533636.
    Abstract:
    To determine the optimal recording site for phrenic nerve conduction studies, six different recording techniques were compared in 11 healthy volunteers (22 phrenic nerves). The mean diaphragm compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude, side-to-side difference, and the number of studies with a false-positive result (CMAP amplitude <0.30 mV) were compared for each technique. The largest amplitude (0.65 +/- 0.23 mV, range 0.30-1.2 mV) with good right-left agreement (mean difference 0.15 mV) and no false positives was obtained using technique 1, where the G1 electrode was positioned 5 cm above the xiphoid process and G2 16 cm from G1 along the costal margin. This was also the easiest technique to perform. It does not require rib counting, which may be difficult and inaccurate, especially in overweight patients. At least one false positive occurred with each of the remaining five techniques.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]