These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Concordance analysis of an in vitro micronucleus screening assay and the regulatory chromosome aberration assay using pharmaceutical drug candidates.
    Author: Homiski ML, Muehlbauer PA, Dobo KL, Schuler MJ, Aubrecht J.
    Journal: Environ Mol Mutagen; 2010 Jan; 51(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 19551811.
    Abstract:
    The in vitro micronucleus assay is under consideration by regulatory agencies as a suitable alternative to the in vitro chromosome aberration (CA) assay. At Pfizer, we utilized a non-Good Laboratory practices cytokinesis-block in vitro micronucleus (CBMN) assay in CHO cells as a screen to predict the regulatory outcome of the human lymphocyte CA assay, and we have retrospectively analyzed a highly select set of 112 internal drug candidates to measure concordance. Overall, our exploratory CBMN correctly classified 97 of 112 (86.6%) compounds in the CA assay. Specificity was high with 87 of 92 (94.6%) CA negative compounds correctly classified by CBMN. Sensitivity was low at 50% with 10 of 20 CA positive compounds correctly classified by CBMN; this may be attributed to the low number of CA positives in the select set. In an attempt to improve sensitivity, we increased the number of CA positives by combining our internal set with an industrial data set previously published (Miller B et al. 1997: Mutat Res 392:45-59). When combined, concordance was 86.7% (143/165), specificity was 91.2% (114/125), and sensitivity increased to 72.5% (29/40). Because cytotoxicity is considered a confounding factor of in vitro test systems, we also examined, within the Pfizer data set, the influence of cytotoxicity in the CBMN assay, and the results indicated that seemingly low (<50%) or excessively high (>70%) levels of cytotoxicity did not significantly alter predicted CA outcome. These collective analyses contribute to growing evidence that the CBMN assay is a suitable regulatory option in the standard battery of genetic toxicology tests.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]